<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Expo62 Bites the Dust</title>
	<link>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust</link>
	<description>News and Reviews of Seattle's Condo and Loft Communities</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust#comment-37211</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust#comment-37211</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to take a second to let everyone know that Intracorp met with me and my fiancée today. Together we came to a satisfactory resolution of our issues with them. We are both now happy with how this situation has worked out.

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to take a second to let everyone know that Intracorp met with me and my fiancée today. Together we came to a satisfactory resolution of our issues with them. We are both now happy with how this situation has worked out.</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust#comment-35823</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust#comment-35823</guid>
		<description>Instead of signing away any further rights by accepting the rescission agreement I opted to contact a lawyer. 

There are at least two versions of the PSA, one with a specified date of rescission - Jan. 15th - and one without. Fortunately I purchased into Expo 62 early enough to have received the latter contract. BUT, I suspect that Intracorp may have blown this stipulated date as I know I received my rescission agreement on the 18th postmarked - and this is the critical date - the 16th.

Language in the contract stipulates that Intracorp must make a "good-faith" effort to complete the sale - clearly they did not. 

The pricing for my unit was offered below market-value. As such, I feel that by failing to close this sale I am out an appreciable sum.

Further, I feel insulted and irritated by Intracorp's miserly offer of compensation- 10K off my next Intracorp purchase - and the, to date, 4 phone calls asking my fiancée to send in the rescission agreement, the 3 latter calls made after she clearly stated we needed time to review the document. 

As such I feel it is wholly appropriate to pursue legal remedy. The attorney I have spoken with is interested in possibly pursuing a class-action suit against Intracorp.

If you are interested in what legal standing your case may have please contact me via email: njcenac@gmail.com and I will pass your information along to my attorney.

In the interest of full disclosure, I happen to work at a condo law firm. This is the firm I've gone to for legal advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of signing away any further rights by accepting the rescission agreement I opted to contact a lawyer. </p>
<p>There are at least two versions of the PSA, one with a specified date of rescission - Jan. 15th - and one without. Fortunately I purchased into Expo 62 early enough to have received the latter contract. BUT, I suspect that Intracorp may have blown this stipulated date as I know I received my rescission agreement on the 18th postmarked - and this is the critical date - the 16th.</p>
<p>Language in the contract stipulates that Intracorp must make a &#8220;good-faith&#8221; effort to complete the sale - clearly they did not. </p>
<p>The pricing for my unit was offered below market-value. As such, I feel that by failing to close this sale I am out an appreciable sum.</p>
<p>Further, I feel insulted and irritated by Intracorp&#8217;s miserly offer of compensation- 10K off my next Intracorp purchase - and the, to date, 4 phone calls asking my fiancée to send in the rescission agreement, the 3 latter calls made after she clearly stated we needed time to review the document. </p>
<p>As such I feel it is wholly appropriate to pursue legal remedy. The attorney I have spoken with is interested in possibly pursuing a class-action suit against Intracorp.</p>
<p>If you are interested in what legal standing your case may have please contact me via email: <a href="mailto:njcenac@gmail.com">njcenac@gmail.com</a> and I will pass your information along to my attorney.</p>
<p>In the interest of full disclosure, I happen to work at a condo law firm. This is the firm I&#8217;ve gone to for legal advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uptown</title>
		<link>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust#comment-35342</link>
		<dc:creator>uptown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust#comment-35342</guid>
		<description>Mike &#38; jac,

Be thankful they didn't let you close, then sell off the extra units to an investor as apartments.  Just one more of the joys of buying pre-sale condos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike &amp; jac,</p>
<p>Be thankful they didn&#8217;t let you close, then sell off the extra units to an investor as apartments.  Just one more of the joys of buying pre-sale condos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust#comment-35265</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust#comment-35265</guid>
		<description>I am also an unhappy buyer at Expo 62 as well (#407)  and I'm not speaking out on behalf of anyone other than myself or giving legal advice.

Section 7b, near the end of page 4 of my PSA:

"Seller reserves the right to terminate this Agreement on or before January 15, 2008 by written notice to Buyer, and instructions to the Escrow Agent to return the earnest money to Buyer, with any interest that has accrued thereon.

Upon such termination and refund/payment being made to Buyer, neither the Seller nor the Seller's agents shall be under any further or continuing obligation or liability for moving costs, housing costs, financing costs, loss of financing, increase in interest rate, lost profits, or special, indirect, incidental, consequential or punitive damages, and Buyer and Seller shall each be released from any and all claims by the the other of any kind of nature."

My buyer's agent did tell me that very early versions of the contract may not have had the January 15th provision.

This legalese seems to state that any financing costs (lock in rate payments) are not refundable.  That said, everyone was pressuring you into locking in at the earliest opportunity - the site agent, the site lender, your lender, even your buyer's agent. Luckily, I'm the analyzing type that reads all 15 pages of legalese and saw that I was basically bending myself over to do so before January 15th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also an unhappy buyer at Expo 62 as well (#407)  and I&#8217;m not speaking out on behalf of anyone other than myself or giving legal advice.</p>
<p>Section 7b, near the end of page 4 of my PSA:</p>
<p>&#8220;Seller reserves the right to terminate this Agreement on or before January 15, 2008 by written notice to Buyer, and instructions to the Escrow Agent to return the earnest money to Buyer, with any interest that has accrued thereon.</p>
<p>Upon such termination and refund/payment being made to Buyer, neither the Seller nor the Seller&#8217;s agents shall be under any further or continuing obligation or liability for moving costs, housing costs, financing costs, loss of financing, increase in interest rate, lost profits, or special, indirect, incidental, consequential or punitive damages, and Buyer and Seller shall each be released from any and all claims by the the other of any kind of nature.&#8221;</p>
<p>My buyer&#8217;s agent did tell me that very early versions of the contract may not have had the January 15th provision.</p>
<p>This legalese seems to state that any financing costs (lock in rate payments) are not refundable.  That said, everyone was pressuring you into locking in at the earliest opportunity - the site agent, the site lender, your lender, even your buyer&#8217;s agent. Luckily, I&#8217;m the analyzing type that reads all 15 pages of legalese and saw that I was basically bending myself over to do so before January 15th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben_Kakimoto</title>
		<link>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust#comment-35218</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben_Kakimoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust#comment-35218</guid>
		<description>Jac, I believe you'll be entitled to interest but it's not likely to be much.  The one thing you'll definitely want to check on is if you'll get back any fees paid to lock in interest rates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jac, I believe you&#8217;ll be entitled to interest but it&#8217;s not likely to be much.  The one thing you&#8217;ll definitely want to check on is if you&#8217;ll get back any fees paid to lock in interest rates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jac</title>
		<link>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust#comment-35214</link>
		<dc:creator>jac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust#comment-35214</guid>
		<description>Thanks for advice.  I'll do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for advice.  I&#8217;ll do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klt</title>
		<link>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust#comment-35140</link>
		<dc:creator>klt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust#comment-35140</guid>
		<description>Jac, make a call or two and read fine print regarding whether you are entitled to some interest if the developer doesn't finish the project. If I learn anything I'll post it here for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jac, make a call or two and read fine print regarding whether you are entitled to some interest if the developer doesn&#8217;t finish the project. If I learn anything I&#8217;ll post it here for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jac</title>
		<link>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust#comment-35085</link>
		<dc:creator>jac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust#comment-35085</guid>
		<description>Glad some of you saw it coming.  I, however, did not.  They've had our earnest money since May and we've lost out on other opportunities in the meantime.  I’m more than a little upset about it.  Sales were about as dismal as their marketing campaign, unless of course I’m underestimating the power of sandwich boards.  Perhaps if they marketed as heavily for Expo 62 as they did for the Parc I would still have my condo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad some of you saw it coming.  I, however, did not.  They&#8217;ve had our earnest money since May and we&#8217;ve lost out on other opportunities in the meantime.  I’m more than a little upset about it.  Sales were about as dismal as their marketing campaign, unless of course I’m underestimating the power of sandwich boards.  Perhaps if they marketed as heavily for Expo 62 as they did for the Parc I would still have my condo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klt</title>
		<link>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust#comment-35075</link>
		<dc:creator>klt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust#comment-35075</guid>
		<description>^ Correction. November.

http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2007/11/clise-parcel-sold</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ Correction. November.</p>
<p><a href="http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2007/11/clise-parcel-sold" rel="nofollow">http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2007/11/clise-parcel-sold</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klt</title>
		<link>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust#comment-35074</link>
		<dc:creator>klt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seattlecondosandlofts.com/2008/01/expo62-bites-the-dust#comment-35074</guid>
		<description>Called it in Oct. Next up, Domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Called it in Oct. Next up, Domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
